Poll: Which maps (if any) should be retired? This poll is closed. |
|||
Sharkfood Island | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
68 | 11.91% |
Long Nine | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 5.08% |
Glitch | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 3.85% |
Foundry | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
74 | 12.96% |
Sweetie Plains | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 6.13% |
Peekaboo | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
84 | 14.71% |
Reaper | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 6.30% |
Thorn Gulley | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 5.78% |
Don't remove any maps! | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
190 | 33.27% |
Total | 571 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Which Maps to Retire?
02-06-2013, 02:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-06-2013 02:43 AM by vegaprom.)
Post: #62
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which Maps to Retire?
Another point why I disagree at retiring map.
Many players outside this forum are interested in league games, not tournaments. They sometimes join friendly games but if those maps are removed, they will not focus on Peekaboo, Sharkfood or Foundry in friendly game and may decide to give up because it won't help them in practicing for league points, eventually those maps will only be played in tournaments and may be almost completely neglected. (I think ST or masters who vote for removing the map won't play it either in friendly since they don't like the map.) I recommend rebalancing the map instead of retiring so that the map won't be ignored. Hope this would be one of the good reason. 1v1 ![]() 2v2 w/dekwat :master:Waiting Beaver Division |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)
5 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content