Messages In This Thread

CombatEX · (This post was last modified: 01-29-2013 02:41 PM by CombatEX.)

(01-29-2013 01:30 PM)GreatGonzales Wrote: Waaaaait a second. Why should someone get more points from beating a Masters league player than a Super Titan, EVER? All that should matter is the hidden skill ranking IMO. The amount of points you get should be purely derived from the level of accomplishment; it is a greater accomplishment to defeat a ST than a Masters, always, assuming that the league assignment is correct for the respective players.

That said...I don't personally care about the division ranking, so if the consensus is in favor of this change, okeedoke.

Well, I agree that all that should matter is hidden-rating, however that does mean you should be able to get more points from beating a Masters player than a Super-Titan as many Masters players are rated more highly than Super-Titans and just have yet to be promoted (grrrr). But yes, it seems weird to discover that points aren't determined purely by hidden-rating! Aren't points supposed to be reflective of skill? And isn't the best way to do that by looking at a player's true skill rating?