Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OSN Data Sharing Initiative
04-24-2014, 07:17 AM (This post was last modified: 04-24-2014 07:22 AM by GreatGonzales.)
Post: #81
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
(04-24-2014 07:03 AM)His_Daddy Wrote:  
(04-24-2014 06:27 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  Interesting, haven't heard of this. I'll have to file this away - did you teach yourself how to use R?
Nah, learnt it from class. I was stat major.
SAS, R, STATA, SPSS, Sudaan are the top packages in stat area and R is my personal favorite.
It's not that difficult to learn though, basically you can find most of the answers to your question on google.

Cool. I've used STATA in the past for stats. As an aside, I may have missed my calling as a statistician. I get excited about massive spreadsheets. Smile

It'll be GG when you're up against GG of GG.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-26-2014, 02:07 AM
Post: #82
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
What do you all think is a more interesting statistic:

Win percentage of fluffy adorables players vs fluffy [insert team] players

or

Win percentage of fluffy adorables players vs ALL leagues [insert team] players

Basically the question is, do we need to only consider matches between two persons of the same league, so it's an apples to apples comparison. If we include matches from people of two different leagues, this will diminish the win percentage of fluffy, inflate the win percentage of ST (for example). But it might still be interesting?

It'll be GG when you're up against GG of GG.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-26-2014, 02:24 AM
Post: #83
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
It may be interesting, but it's also less accurate. Kinda. There's pros and cons for both. The main reason I would prefer just fluffy vs fluffy only, clever vs clever only, is 1) it removes some of the replays when players are climbing the ladder from bottom to top, making it more realistic and 2) you could instead have the categories FvsF, FvsC, CvsC and so on for an even larger range (some may be small samples though). You may be able to even see how much of a gap in skill there is between high and lower rated players there are and which special lower rated players are best with. You can also see how many games where a ST is matched to a fluffy.

With the first option you would have duplicate matches crossing over different categories, making comparing league usage and w/l or races less accurate e.g 500 games are gifted vs master, this would be duplicated in both the gifted and master dataset.

Top 200 peak ranking: #18 Super-Titan

I'm currently taking a competative break. Am up for friendlies and tournaments!

(06-09-2014 02:14 PM)Bbobb555 Wrote:  I looked it up, apparently a kendama is a yo-yo (!). How the heck do you have forums for yo-yos?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-26-2014, 02:40 AM
Post: #84
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
Good point on matches being duplicated if we go with the second option. Anyway both are possible, but the second option is more difficult for me.

It'll be GG when you're up against GG of GG.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-26-2014, 02:35 PM (This post was last modified: 04-26-2014 02:38 PM by .Memories..)
Post: #85
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
Here's a quick go at some stats...

Here are results for 1v1 CLAN vs CLAN league games from the (4-18-2014) data set.
Code:
results =
            Anon  DL    GG    IBBP  iPro  WP
     Anon   0     6     0     0     0     2
     DL     7     1     0     0     0     3
     GG     0     2     0     0     0     1
     IBBP   0     0     0     0     0     0
     iPro   0     0     0     0     0     0
     WP     0     4     0     0     0     2

Rows = winner, columns = loser. So, for example, Anonymous beat DL 6 times and WP 2 times.

I'm planning on doing more Clan stats based on the data - this was just something quick after I got my program working.

[Image: sig.png][Image: 2q2lq9y.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-26-2014, 11:40 PM
Post: #86
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
IBBP still exists?

You can ask a...
[Image: 6BmXQqC.jpg]
(drawing by Chemoeum)

[Image: sig.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-27-2014, 12:27 AM
Post: #87
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
I just dumped the rest of the data. Let me know if anything looks odd or missing.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-27-2014, 12:42 AM (This post was last modified: 04-27-2014 12:42 AM by .Memories..)
Post: #88
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
(04-26-2014 11:40 PM)Mag!cGuy Wrote:  IBBP still exists?

On OSN they do.

(04-27-2014 12:27 AM)CodePenguin Wrote:  I just dumped the rest of the data. Let me know if anything looks odd or missing.

Thanks!

[Image: sig.png][Image: 2q2lq9y.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-27-2014, 01:11 AM
Post: #89
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
Wow that's a lot of data.

[Image: sig.png]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-27-2014, 10:33 AM
Post: #90
RE: OSN Data Sharing Initiative
(04-27-2014 12:27 AM)CodePenguin Wrote:  I just dumped the rest of the data. Let me know if anything looks odd or missing.

Eeeeexcellent.

It'll be GG when you're up against GG of GG.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content