Q & A: Retardedness
01-20-2013, 03:55 AM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
Why is this so complicated?
I know Franklin is dead, but who is this Mr Frankln? Rising Star Tournament for Fluffy, Clever and Gifted players - FINAL ROUND started! |
|||
01-20-2013, 03:58 AM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
Wrong, Ekofox
14g-5gk-6xy mwahaha Once a master of nothing, now a noob to pretty much everything. Hiatus resolved. I stalk these hallways again. GC Silent_Dynasty because I'm indecisive and whatever ;u; |
|||
01-20-2013, 06:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2013 06:34 AM by EkoFox.)
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
Ok, that's not a simplification, that's a change of the expression. You get a different result if you evaluate that versus the original expression. Example: For g = 1, k = 2, x = 3, y = 4;
Original expression = -68 Your 'simplified' expression = 76 Order of operations is important. Back on topic: That was supposed to be Ben Franklin... What's the difference between saying, " I mean what I say" and' "I say what I mean?" (Answering eijolend's question) Because we're all mad here. |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:00 AM
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
(01-20-2013 06:33 AM)EkoFox Wrote: Ok, that's not a simplification, that's a change of the expression. You get a different result if you evaluate that versus the original expression. Example: For g = 1, k = 2, x = 3, y = 4; I do not approve of your logic. FIRST EXPRESSION: 14*1-(5*1*2+6*3*4)=14-(10+72)=14-82=-68. SECOND EXPRESSION: 14*1-5*2*1-6*3*4=14-10-72=-68. I can math properly |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2013 07:22 AM by Wildt4lon.)
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
I think some of your maths is a little rusty, ekofox
Once a master of nothing, now a noob to pretty much everything. Hiatus resolved. I stalk these hallways again. GC Silent_Dynasty because I'm indecisive and whatever ;u; |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2013 07:29 AM by EkoFox.)
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
In your second expression you swapped an addition with a subtraction symbol.
I was solving as if you had only taken out the parentheses. |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2013 07:31 AM by Wildt4lon.)
Post: #17
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
What's the answer to this question?
Well, 'I mean what I say' means that you mean what you say. And of course, 'I say what I mean' means that you say what you mean. so the first two words and the last two words swap around. That can't possibly be wrong because it's TRUE. Ekofox, I swapped + for a - AND got rid of the brackets. Any clues there? Once a master of nothing, now a noob to pretty much everything. Hiatus resolved. I stalk these hallways again. GC Silent_Dynasty because I'm indecisive and whatever ;u; |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2013 07:38 AM by EkoFox.)
Post: #18
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
(01-20-2013 07:26 AM)Wildtalon1851 Wrote: Honesty, that's because you're * by -1!When do you multiply by -1? If you're saying you multiplied the whole thing by -1, the it would have to be -1(14g - (5gk + 6xy)) = -14g - (-5gk - 6xy). But the point is that is the expression in its simplest form; you can't just multiply by random numbers and call it simplified. |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:34 AM
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
14g-(etc.
I'll let you work it out. C'mon this is only lvl 6 maths! Once a master of nothing, now a noob to pretty much everything. Hiatus resolved. I stalk these hallways again. GC Silent_Dynasty because I'm indecisive and whatever ;u; |
|||
01-20-2013, 07:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-20-2013 07:53 AM by EkoFox.)
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Q & A: Retardedness
I'm going to type out my interpretation and you tell me if I got it wrong:
14 multiplied by variable 'g' minus quantity 5 multiplied by g multiplied by k plus 6 multiplied by x multiplied by y. You're asking me to evaluate (5gk + 6xy) and subtract the result from 14g. Right or wrong? My thought is that you meant 14g(5gk+6xy) (without the subtraction) and wanted me to apply the distributive property. But you're saying that 14g - (5gk + 6xy) is the same thing as 14g - 5gk - 6xy, right? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
7 Guest(s)
7 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content