Weekly Top 200 - 01/04/2013

[Necrocat219]

(01-06-2013 12:49 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  

(01-05-2013 03:47 PM)QuantumApocalypse Wrote:  Do you think you could have the graphs by 200-x so that being up high corresponds to a higher rank?

Yeah I can look into that..

Graphs would make me jelly!

[QuantumApocalypse]

Down to the 70's

[TheQwertiest]

(01-08-2013 09:09 PM)QuantumApocalypse Wrote:  Down to the 70's

what is down to the 70's?

[QuantumApocalypse]

(01-08-2013 09:18 PM)TheQwertiest Wrote:  

(01-08-2013 09:09 PM)QuantumApocalypse Wrote:  Down to the 70's

what is down to the 70's?

My ranking :/ Reaper, both Adorables, I was P1 and screwed up my rush and his got to me first, and he was in the gifted league. My next match was against a Masters player.

[GreatGonzales]

(01-06-2013 12:49 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  

(01-05-2013 03:47 PM)QuantumApocalypse Wrote:  Do you think you could have the graphs by 200-x so that being up high corresponds to a higher rank?

Yeah I can look into that..

BTW QuantumApocalypse I did look into making the graphs scale upward for going "up" in rank, rather than downward, but I don't think there's a good way to do it using the built-in google gocs tools. I can create the graphs using 200-x of course, but doing so loses the precise rank for each data point. I would like users to be able to see the given rank without having to do the math in their heads. And I looked into providing data labels with the actual rank, and this works, but there is a significant sacrifice to look and feel. So, I think I will keep the graphs as-is.

[QuantumApocalypse]

(01-09-2013 02:35 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  BTW QuantumApocalypse I did look into making the graphs scale upward for going "up" in rank, rather than downward, but I don't think there's a good way to do it using the built-in google gocs tools. I can create the graphs using 200-x of course, but doing so loses the precise rank for each data point. I would like users to be able to see the given rank without having to do the math in their heads. And I looked into providing data labels with the actual rank, and this works, but there is a significant sacrifice to look and feel. So, I think I will keep the graphs as-is.

Ah, ok. That's fine then

[XixonDale]

Why do i see players from the master League in the top 200 are there only 100 Titans?

[QuantumApocalypse]

(01-09-2013 08:21 PM)XixonDale Wrote:  Why do i see players from the master League in the top 200 are there only 100 Titans?

As of now there are just below 90 ST players. And the Masters are the ones fighting hard to get to ST anyway

[Harti]

Before season 2 started, there were 200 Super-Titans while there were lots of Masters in the top 200 list, too. It's nothing bad really, shortly dropping out of 200 doesn't directly demote you to Master league I guess.

[Sharugames]

And guess who's the latest Super Titan player ???

P.S.: Quantum its your turn