Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
12-14-2012, 01:01 PM
Post: #71
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
Almost fell from the first page!
|
|||
12-14-2012, 06:21 PM
Post: #72
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
3 2v2 ST. Ppl are moving up
iPro |
|||
12-14-2012, 06:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-14-2012 06:48 PM by TheQwertiest.)
Post: #73
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
(12-14-2012 06:21 PM)Mr.Banger Wrote: 3 2v2 ST. Ppl are moving up wow. any known forumers that moved up to ST? nevermind i saw your division |
|||
12-15-2012, 12:43 AM
Post: #74
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
|
|||
12-15-2012, 01:59 AM
Post: #75
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
Us, allynboballyn, and krogoth
iPro |
|||
12-15-2012, 02:05 AM
Post: #76
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
|
|||
12-15-2012, 05:06 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2012 05:18 AM by worldfamous.)
Post: #77
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
(12-15-2012 01:59 AM)Mr.Banger Wrote: Us, allynboballyn, and krogoth Those 2 are definitely the toughest we've faced, besides you guys. Unfortunately we've had a choppy run lately but I have to imagine we're close. Seems like we beat those guys when we're P1 and lose when P2. Now that the completion is much stronger, it's time to revisit FTA for 2v2. At a minimum, FT needs to be random. Mr banger, I'm willing to bet that 99-100% of your games are as P1. That's not meant to question your record or ability to win as P2, but rather as an indictment of the system. Because you are ranked so much higher than everyone else, there is rarely anyone in the cue that matches you hidden ranking. Therefore, you almost always start as P1. This is so incredibly backwards. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I really hope I'm wrong. Look out for Juslas and Akkete. They've beat us 2 out of 3 and are very strong. |
|||
12-15-2012, 05:27 AM
Post: #78
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
Ya, almost all our games are P1. Maybe the new rules allow for promotion too easily? We haven't lost to one of those pairs.
iPro |
|||
12-15-2012, 06:09 AM
Post: #79
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
(12-15-2012 05:27 AM)Mr.Banger Wrote: Ya, almost all our games are P1. Maybe the new rules allow for promotion too easily? We haven't lost to one of those pairs. Actually, I think they need to loosen it up more. Even though I feel you guys are a league above us and most of our peers, it doesn't make sense to have a league of 1. DieMFDie and I should be ST and so should a lot of others. We're all just beating each other trying to get to super Titan when we should already be there. So far I've only come across 4 or 5 teams that even give us a hard time. If that doesn't qualify us, I don't know what will. |
|||
12-15-2012, 06:17 AM
Post: #80
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Petition: We want 2v2 top lists!
It could be that you both have such a higher rating than everyone else that until a few manage to break into ST, you will set the standards O_O
Top 200 peak ranking: #18 I'm currently taking a competative break. Am up for friendlies and tournaments! (06-09-2014 02:14 PM)Bbobb555 Wrote: I looked it up, apparently a kendama is a yo-yo (!). How the heck do you have forums for yo-yos? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
26 Guest(s)
26 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content