Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs
08-04-2012, 01:29 PM (This post was last modified: 08-04-2012 01:31 PM by swimj.)
Post: #4
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs
I think the biggest benefit is that a boosted heavy has 5hp, so if your opponent wants to take it in one turn it will take either soldier+heavy, soldier+soldier+runner, heavy+runner+runner, or sniper with some similar combination. On defense, as sniper is likely not in play for your opponent (unless there is a mobi), having that heavy gives a bit of insurance on holding key spots that can only be attacked from a few angles.

It is also a really good defense for the shell, especially if you're playing on a map which has holes (sharkfood, glitch, even blitz beach for 2v2s) to place the shell where it can only be attacked from one hex if the shell is defended with a correctly placed heavy.

I definitely prefer soldiers on offense though, and would definitely take two soldiers over one heavy and one runner, despite that they are all 4 damage total.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 08:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-04-2012, 09:06 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - swimj - 08-04-2012 01:29 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-04-2012, 09:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 10:01 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 03:27 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 04:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 05:08 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-06-2012, 09:31 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-07-2012, 10:41 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-08-2012, 01:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - yasw - 08-08-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - SC-FTW - 08-18-2012, 10:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-22-2012, 05:47 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Magnum - 10-15-2012, 12:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Gf!sh - 12-23-2012, 02:50 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content