OML - Where is the 2v2 love?

[CombatEX]

(02-17-2013 09:05 AM)alexjiang1 Wrote:  

(02-17-2013 08:05 AM)CombatEX Wrote:  There doesn't need to be a significant advantage to warrant an FTA fix. Just look at the numbers and you'll see Ravernoth's suggestion just makes things more even.

Forgive me, I mistyped, but from what I see, our opponent already gets out their BS earlier than us, with the change, it'll be even earlier. I don't know, it's probably just our style of play and methods are outdated

Well, mathematically the only way your opponent could get out a bombshell faster is an issue of style since as P1 you have access to more wits earlier.

(02-17-2013 11:07 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  But clearly it's better to be P1/P3 than P2/P4. Mathematically, there is FTA. OML should attempt to balance this, especially considering the growing "rejecting" trend.

While I agree with you that they should implement the FTA fix, I feel that the growing rejecting trend is also due quite a bit to map picking.