Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs
10-20-2012, 07:43 PM
Post: #58
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs
I actually don't see a problem with the heavy unit. It is not as versatile as the soldier, thats agreed but if played right a team of a runner, a heavy and a medic can be a matchwinning force. We should be careful to demand rebalancings of the unit strengths as the current setup is already very balanced and one of the striking advantages of Outwitters over competing strategy games is its clean, simple and well balanced concept.

[Image: sig.png][Image: 2u7x1fb.jpg]
awesome signature design by .Memories.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 08:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-04-2012, 09:06 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - swimj - 08-04-2012, 01:29 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-04-2012, 09:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 10:01 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 03:27 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 04:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 05:08 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-06-2012, 09:31 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-07-2012, 10:41 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-08-2012, 01:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - yasw - 08-08-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - SC-FTW - 08-18-2012, 10:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-22-2012, 05:47 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Magnum - 10-15-2012, 12:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - =) Random Task (= - 10-20-2012 07:43 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Gf!sh - 12-23-2012, 02:50 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
23 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content