The future of Outwitters

[awpertunity]

(07-30-2014 03:30 PM)LegacyofEight Wrote:  I had idea for 1v1v1v1!

Played on Blitz Beach

Yellow and Blue are "sabotage" players. Their goal is to stop red and green from accomplishing their goal. Red and Green are "rushers". They have to destroy the base of the player across from them. Whoever accomplishes their goal wins.

The rushers play normally, rushing the base across from them. Sabotage players try to hinder them by spawn squats, etc. Rushers have some ways of blocking sabotages, though and they are........TBD!!!!!!!! We can discuss this later but is the idea good?

lol I had a similar idea a while ago and just thought it was too complicated. my version was played as 2v2 but you're on the opposite team of your partner so you're going for the same goal together. spawn squatting wasn't going to be allowed though.

---

(07-30-2014 02:14 PM).Memories. Wrote:  But, wouldn't 1v1v1 be cool, too? I vote yes.

Free for alls in strategy games are silly. The turtling player will always win the the early aggressor and early defender is always screwed... I hated this mode in Starcraft for exactly this reason. You don't benefit from ever attacking, but can only lose units and resources for doing so.

---

Forgive the grammar just on my phone