Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs
10-14-2012, 05:20 PM
Post: #52
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs
(10-12-2012 04:16 PM)worldfamous Wrote:  Interesting idea but I think it's essentially a wash in terms of increasing heavy value. It basically shifts the heavy from a tank to DPS. Without the healer, the heavy is an easy kill.

I dunno. As it is now a heavy costs 2 more wits to spawn than a soldier.

If there was no medic...

-To kill a 3hp soldier with a heavy takes 2 wits (1 to move, 1 to attack)

-To kill a 4 hp heavy you need 2 attacking units no matter what. No unit does more than 3 damage. Not only do you need 2 units, but it takes 4 wits to kill (move 1, attack 1, move 2 attack 2).

That initial 2 wit investment is made up pretty quickly. It's the 4hp soldiers that cause the problem, both with this heavy situation and with turtling. You always need 2 units to attack them no matter what.

Would the game balance be changed for the better if the heavy did 4 damage?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 08:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-04-2012, 09:06 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - swimj - 08-04-2012, 01:29 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-04-2012, 09:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 10:01 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 03:27 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 04:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 05:08 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-06-2012, 09:31 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-07-2012, 10:41 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-08-2012, 01:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - yasw - 08-08-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - SC-FTW - 08-18-2012, 10:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-22-2012, 05:47 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Sakiehl - 10-14-2012 05:20 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Magnum - 10-15-2012, 12:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Gf!sh - 12-23-2012, 02:50 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
14 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content