Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs
10-11-2012, 07:27 AM
Post: #45
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs
(10-11-2012 02:22 AM)Sakiehl Wrote:  I think someone already mentioned this, but in 2v2 I've been seeing heavies being way more valuable. I think this is because I also see far more 3hp soldiers and fewer 4hp soldiers. Heavies eat the 3hp guys up.

I wonder if getting rid of the pre-deployed medics would make heavies more useful.
Oh, nice one. Maybe something for someone with beta forum access to bring to the developers attention for future maps?

(10-11-2012 02:22 AM)Sakiehl Wrote:  In 2v2 people seem less likely to spawn a medic for themselves. My thinking is this might be true in 1v1 as well, but on most boards you already start off with a medic.
Think of 2v2 as 1v1 with special rules. Then it makes sense for medics to be less valuable as you can only do the common play of create-boost-move in the same turn on half your units instead of all of them as in 1v1.

Soldier spam FTW
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
"Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 08:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-04-2012, 09:06 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - swimj - 08-04-2012, 01:29 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-04-2012, 09:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 10:01 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 03:27 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 04:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 05:08 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-06-2012, 09:31 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-07-2012, 10:41 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-08-2012, 01:56 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - yasw - 08-08-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - SC-FTW - 08-18-2012, 10:44 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-22-2012, 05:47 PM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 10-11-2012 07:27 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Magnum - 10-15-2012, 12:18 AM
RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Gf!sh - 12-23-2012, 02:50 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
26 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content