Publicize hidden rankings
02-24-2014, 07:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2014 07:11 AM by CombatEX.)
Post: #45
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Publicize hidden rankings
(02-15-2014 06:11 AM)HuskyPete Wrote: I question the horror of people ranked in the 6,000s. If you are in fluffy, clever, or gifted, I believe you know you have a long way to go from the top! I know I did (and do) Certainly "horror" probably isn't the reaction most would feel. That's why I used the word "discouraged". Of course, not everyone would be discouraged. Many players can shrug it off and keep working at it despite having a long road ahead of them. However, not everyone is like you and these other motivated individuals. We don't have much data to work with but I feel there is some validity to the decision OML, Blizzard, and Riot have made. While not "horrified" by being ranked in the thousands, I'm sure a good number of players would feel worse about being rank 5,000/10,000 instead of 50/100. Is it logical to feel worse? Not really. Are people always logical? No. So it's still an issue even if it shouldn't be. Pros/Cons Option 1. Completely Transparent Rankings (players are rated from top to bottom rank by their true skill rating) + Players can see exactly where they are compared to other players in terms of their true skill rating - Some lower ranking players will be discouraged at how far down in the rankings they are - OML has to update Outwitters Option 2. Sectioned Rankings (players are rated by their true skill rating within 100 player divisions) + Players can see where they are compared to other players in terms of their true skill rating fairly accurately - Though players can see where they are overall (top of Master, middle of Fluffy, Bottom of Gifted, etc), they cannot make exact comparisons with specific players until reaching the top 200 - OML has to update Outwitters Option 3. Current System + OML doesn't have to update Outwitters - Players outside of the top 200 have a hard time judging how they rank within their league - Points are a meaningless and misleading measurement of skill Summary At the end of the day, the question is "Why do you want a change to the rankings?" If the answer is "I want to see exactly how I rank compared with a certain player," then Option 1 makes the most sense. If the answer is "I want to see how my skill is increasing and decreasing even if I'm not in the top 200," then Option 2 serves essentially the same purpose as solution 1 while avoiding the potential for discouraging lower league players. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
11 Guest(s)
11 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content