Publicize hidden rankings
02-10-2014, 10:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-10-2014 10:45 AM by jchris98.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Publicize hidden rankings
(02-10-2014 09:04 AM)awpertunity Wrote: No they should not. This argument can be disproven by looking at chess. They have public ratings and people know what they're going up against. This makes a win much more satisfying to actually see your rating increase after a win. There are several sites for chess that tree rating is published but that doesn't stop people from playing. (02-10-2014 10:19 AM)Setorines Wrote: I voted no also. It's hidden for a reason. I don't even understand, you voted no because of its name??? (02-10-2014 09:26 AM)ElPared Wrote: I voted no because I don't think they should be public. I would vote yes if they were visible privately, but only if you are in Masters League or higher so you'd know how close you are the the top 200 and stuff. What if it were an IAP, that way new people are unlikely to spend money and thn quit because they see how much better some people are, it is highly unlikely for someone to spend money and then immediately quit. And if you are in clever, you most likely have a general idea that you are a long way from the top anyway. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
12 Guest(s)
12 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content