Alex: Proof that FTA is huge and needs addressing now, and how to fix it

[ArtNJ]

If it turns out that +3 is too dramatic because on certain maps it allows P2 to control the map, P2 could get +1/+1/+1 for the first three turns (or you could extend it another turn if testing shows necessary).

In general, I like changes that make it fair while impacting gameplay as little as possible, and the +3 makes me a tiny bit nervous in this regard. That is why I like ideas like the +1/+1/+1.

I get that folks dont like hobling p1 with only 3 wits, but there are other solutions that are likely to cause fewer gameplay problems than +3 wits to P2. With thorough testing this would drop out, so I dont have any real objection to testing +3 for P2, I'm just concerned about it.