Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alex: Proof that FTA is huge and needs addressing now, and how to fix it
09-26-2012, 04:11 AM
Post: #44
RE: Alex: Proof that FTA is huge and needs addressing now, and how to fix it
(09-26-2012 04:06 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  Would it be better to give 8 wits to P2 on small maps, 9 wits to P2 on large maps? It would switch to +5/-4/+3/-4/+3 rather than +5/-3/+4/-3/+4. I suggest this because I think you could make an argument that P1 retains the advantage of getting positioning on P2, so it makes sense to give the edge to P2 rather than P1, if someone has to get an edge.

I agree with that, but in terms of transparency and accessibility, I don't think OML will want to confuse the player as to why they are receiving 3 extra wits one game and 4 the next.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Alex: Proof that FTA is huge and needs addressing now, and how to fix it - Ravernoth - 09-26-2012 04:11 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
6 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content