Alex: Proof that FTA is huge and needs addressing now, and how to fix it

[Ravernoth]

(09-25-2012 11:05 AM)awpertunity Wrote:  Regardless, the important thing is we both agree FTA exists and is large

Yes

(09-25-2012 03:58 PM)Cookie Wrote:  I still think giving the first player fewer wits is a better solution. The main reason is that it breaks less convention in the game, by not allowing a single player a turn with lots of wits right at the start.

But having said that, the solution of giving the 2nd player extra wits would probably work pretty well also.

P1 currently has the option of being P2 with 10 wits whenever he wants. Or being P2 with a bonus space and 9 wits.

If P1 started with 3 wits he would still have the option of being P2 with 8 wits. Or being P2 with a bonus space and 7 wits.

So giving P2 8 wits is actually giving less flexibility than giving P1 3 wits, if I'm getting my point across