Alex: Proof that FTA is huge and needs addressing now, and how to fix it

[Ravernoth]

(09-24-2012 08:03 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote:  Because I think extensive playtesting is required before we can decide whether it is actually the best solution. Also, though, I think this proposal of mine should be implemented regardless - because P1 and P2 will never be EXACTLY equal, I don't think. Thus, their gain/loss in rank should reflect that.

I see your point about having change in rank reflect any remaining imbalance.

Regarding the P1 : P2 imbalance, 8 wits for P2 may not be the sweet spot. 7, or 9 may be better. But 8 will definitely bring the odds much closer for P1 : P2 than 2.7 to 1

There is no need for extensive playtesting to verify that it will be a big improvement, especially when OML is short on resources.

We can make a simple change, look at the improvement, and then move a wit or 2 either way if needed to get us closest to 50:50.