iPro vs Wolfpack Meeting : iPro discussion

[game_taker]

I still prefer defence.

(12-03-2013 01:04 AM)Thrutchy Wrote:  Here are other attack ideas to investigate:

(1) Instead of hiding the scrambler behind the medic, maybe move back the scrambled soldier and fake putting the scrambler behind it. hope they take the bait
(2) Them scrambling both of our scramblers might not be as bad as we think. We'll still have a lot of units left near their base. There might be a better position for us where we can takeover there spawn on the next turn and kill the closest scrambler to their base. We could even consider making it even easier for them to do this to get our units in a better position if they go that route.
(3) Some other meta gaming where we force a blind choice on them such that it gives us a gambling chance.

(2) Is a bad thing.
For (3) what I came up with. But if I had to change up Thurchy attack it would me moving scrambler H6->F7, this way even if they spawn a runner they wont see scrambler.

But even here we lose 4/5 units attack. They have 2 scramblers at there base.
I would really prefer Thurchy's defence instead.
Next turn. Assuming they don't do anything --> runner kills medic, heavy goes for base. Scrambler takes solider F3 and send its to finish base.

If they defend base w/ 2 soldiers 1 in D4, other D3.
Runner kill medic. (1)
Heavy hit base (2)
Scrambler F7 -> C8 (1)
Solider E7 -> C7 (1)
Runner I5 -> e7 or somewhere useful on left side(2)
This should put us in position 2 win.

All in all (1) seems best of Thurtchy's 3 options. But I would prefer the defence followed by attack next turn.