"Heavy" isn't worth the costs

Thread Rating:

6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

"Heavy" isn't worth the costs

08-07-2012, 10:02 PM

Post: #25

Meph1ston Offline

Newbie

Posts: 13
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 0

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs

I think if they should sligthly get buffed they could get life regeneration up to 4 health. They will be mostly killed in one turn but so they become slightly better if they survive. And yeah they can defend really pretty well.

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

"Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 08:44 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-04-2012, 09:06 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - oneadamleft - 08-04-2012, 10:40 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - swimj - 08-04-2012, 01:29 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Joggies - 08-04-2012, 09:50 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-04-2012, 09:56 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 10:01 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Joggies - 08-04-2012, 10:22 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - wonderpug - 08-04-2012, 11:39 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 08-05-2012, 12:06 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 08-05-2012, 01:59 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - jaesonwu - 08-05-2012, 03:24 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 03:27 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Kamikaze28 - 08-05-2012, 04:01 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 04:18 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 05:08 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Meph1ston - 08-05-2012, 08:48 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - whoTookYoste?! - 08-05-2012, 07:32 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - jaesonwu - 08-06-2012, 09:17 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-06-2012, 09:31 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - NathanDetr0it - 08-07-2012, 09:22 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - worldfamous - 08-07-2012, 06:31 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Meph1ston - 08-07-2012 10:02 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-07-2012, 10:41 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - connor3491 - 08-08-2012, 12:49 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-08-2012, 01:56 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - connor3491 - 08-08-2012, 02:18 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Meph1ston - 08-08-2012, 02:52 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Eijolend - 08-08-2012, 05:21 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - yasw - 08-08-2012, 06:57 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - P1noyboypj - 08-18-2012, 09:18 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - SC-FTW - 08-18-2012, 10:44 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - awpertunity - 08-18-2012, 11:33 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - wonderpug - 08-18-2012, 11:34 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - awpertunity - 08-18-2012, 11:41 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - wonderpug - 08-18-2012, 11:45 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Outwitted - 08-22-2012, 03:55 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-22-2012, 05:47 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CommandConquerer - 08-25-2012, 10:12 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - pookywb - 08-22-2012, 05:49 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Sakiehl - 10-11-2012, 02:22 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 10-11-2012, 07:27 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - worldfamous - 10-12-2012, 04:16 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Sakiehl - 10-14-2012, 05:20 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 10-15-2012, 04:35 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Ser Purple Wolf - 10-11-2012, 06:24 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 10-11-2012, 01:57 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Ravernoth - 10-11-2012, 06:57 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 10-14-2012, 04:35 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Eijolend - 10-14-2012, 09:17 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Fluffysox - 10-14-2012, 01:29 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - TheQwertiest - 10-15-2012, 12:14 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Magnum - 10-15-2012, 12:18 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - TheQwertiest - 10-15-2012, 12:38 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Joggies - 10-16-2012, 06:08 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - =) Random Task (= - 10-20-2012, 07:43 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - vegaprom - 12-22-2012, 12:53 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - game_taker - 12-22-2012, 01:31 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - vegaprom - 12-22-2012, 01:55 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Eijolend - 12-22-2012, 07:52 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - game_taker - 12-23-2012, 02:47 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Gf!sh - 12-23-2012, 02:50 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 12-23-2012, 04:29 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Necrocat219 - 12-23-2012, 04:44 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Bluegodzill - 12-23-2012, 04:50 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - TheQwertiest - 12-23-2012, 04:53 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - =) Random Task (= - 12-23-2012, 06:58 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - garcia1000 - 12-23-2012, 11:41 AM

User(s) browsing this thread:
26 Guest(s)

Return to Top Return to Content