Using landscape to your advantage?

[phrenikos]

(05-07-2012 04:42 AM)Kamikaze28 Wrote:  

(05-07-2012 03:11 AM)phrenikos Wrote:  It just adds another spin to strategy turn based games- fftactics comes to mind as an example of a turn based game which used terrain elevation quite well. I also am wondering if all maps are symmetric like the ones shown in pictures. I suppose its easier to balance but the last thing you would want is your opponent copying your every move in outwitters...

Mirroring your opponent is highly improbable in Outwitters due to Fog of War.

While reading this thread, I was thinking about UniWars - some might say very similar to Outwitters. It is a turn based strategy game on a hexagonally tesselated field. And it has these terrain based stat modifications. While looking at UniWars, I was overwhelmed by this complexity, to be frank. Sure it adds depth to the gameplay, but it raises the barrier of entry significantly in my opinion. Either you looked up the stat advantages and disadvantages for a given terrain for all available units (because some units benefit from a given terrain while others suffer) or you learned all combinations by heart, which takes time.
I don't agree with this philosophy. Depth can just as well come from gameplay based on simple rules.

There's alot of depth and content in strategy games as it allows serious players to continually improve their gameplay through learning new ways to give yourself the edge in a match. It's easy for a strategy game to become stagnant as you are inclined to employ the same strategy over and over again (given that you have a good winning strategy) with little to improve on. I think being overwhelmed when starting a strategy game is OK - as it really does show that there is a significant amount of content in the game and it allows players to experiment with new strategies. I understand Outwitters is targetted towards casual and hardcore players alike - so i think adding some content, perhaps in future updates, could encourage players to grow.