"Heavy" isn't worth the costs

Advanced Search

Hello There, Guest! Login — Register

Post Reply

Thread Rating:

6 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

"Heavy" isn't worth the costs

08-05-2012, 12:06 AM (This post was last modified: 08-05-2012 12:10 AM by Alvendor.)

Post: #10

Alvendor Offline

Offline

Clan Anonymous

Anonymous

Posts: 649
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 26

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs

(08-04-2012 11:39 PM)wonderpug Wrote: What if heavies spawned with 5hp?

Probably not desirable as it would strengthen any turtling strategies.

(08-04-2012 10:01 PM)calmon Wrote:
(08-04-2012 09:56 PM)Harti Wrote: Having Heavies deal 4 damage would basically do the job but probably make them overpowered, especially when predeployed.

I like this idea! 4 damage would be a very good solution.

I also agree with the predeployed units. I would just exchange them with a cheaper unit.

Like it as well, it would counter mass soldiers and also any slow pushing with bombshells.

How do you mean it would make it overpowered when predeployed? Any examples?

Soldier spam FTW

Find all posts by this user

Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Post Reply

Messages In This Thread

"Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 08:44 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-04-2012, 09:06 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - oneadamleft - 08-04-2012, 10:40 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - swimj - 08-04-2012, 01:29 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Joggies - 08-04-2012, 09:50 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-04-2012, 09:56 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-04-2012, 10:01 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Joggies - 08-04-2012, 10:22 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - wonderpug - 08-04-2012, 11:39 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 08-05-2012 12:06 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 08-05-2012, 01:59 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - jaesonwu - 08-05-2012, 03:24 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 03:27 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Kamikaze28 - 08-05-2012, 04:01 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Harti - 08-05-2012, 04:18 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 05:08 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Meph1ston - 08-05-2012, 08:48 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - whoTookYoste?! - 08-05-2012, 07:32 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-05-2012, 07:35 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - jaesonwu - 08-06-2012, 09:17 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Syvan - 08-06-2012, 09:31 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - NathanDetr0it - 08-07-2012, 09:22 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - worldfamous - 08-07-2012, 06:31 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Meph1ston - 08-07-2012, 10:02 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - calmon - 08-07-2012, 10:41 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - connor3491 - 08-08-2012, 12:49 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-08-2012, 01:56 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - connor3491 - 08-08-2012, 02:18 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Meph1ston - 08-08-2012, 02:52 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Eijolend - 08-08-2012, 05:21 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - yasw - 08-08-2012, 06:57 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - P1noyboypj - 08-18-2012, 09:18 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - SC-FTW - 08-18-2012, 10:44 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - awpertunity - 08-18-2012, 11:33 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - wonderpug - 08-18-2012, 11:34 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - awpertunity - 08-18-2012, 11:41 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - wonderpug - 08-18-2012, 11:45 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Outwitted - 08-22-2012, 03:55 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Cookie - 08-22-2012, 05:47 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CommandConquerer - 08-25-2012, 10:12 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - pookywb - 08-22-2012, 05:49 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Sakiehl - 10-11-2012, 02:22 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Alvendor - 10-11-2012, 07:27 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - worldfamous - 10-12-2012, 04:16 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Sakiehl - 10-14-2012, 05:20 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 10-15-2012, 04:35 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Ser Purple Wolf - 10-11-2012, 06:24 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 10-11-2012, 01:57 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Ravernoth - 10-11-2012, 06:57 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 10-14-2012, 04:35 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Eijolend - 10-14-2012, 09:17 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Fluffysox - 10-14-2012, 01:29 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - TheQwertiest - 10-15-2012, 12:14 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Magnum - 10-15-2012, 12:18 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - TheQwertiest - 10-15-2012, 12:38 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Joggies - 10-16-2012, 06:08 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - =) Random Task (= - 10-20-2012, 07:43 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - vegaprom - 12-22-2012, 12:53 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - game_taker - 12-22-2012, 01:31 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - vegaprom - 12-22-2012, 01:55 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Eijolend - 12-22-2012, 07:52 PM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - game_taker - 12-23-2012, 02:47 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Gf!sh - 12-23-2012, 02:50 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - CombatEX - 12-23-2012, 04:29 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Necrocat219 - 12-23-2012, 04:44 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - Bluegodzill - 12-23-2012, 04:50 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - TheQwertiest - 12-23-2012, 04:53 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - =) Random Task (= - 12-23-2012, 06:58 AM

RE: "Heavy" isn't worth the costs - garcia1000 - 12-23-2012, 11:41 AM

User(s) browsing this thread:
19 Guest(s)

Return to Top Return to Content