Rising Star Tournament - CONCLUDED

[Gf!sh]

(03-06-2013 07:30 AM)Spidêr Wrote:  

(03-06-2013 01:36 AM)Gf!sh Wrote:  

(03-06-2013 01:21 AM)Spidêr Wrote:  

(03-05-2013 11:42 PM)Gfich Wrote:  May I suggest something? Everyone could play two full games (one as P1, one as P2), and in case of a tie, lowest turn count (of the winning game) would determine the winners. This is gonna heavily encourage rushing, which probably will accellerate games, to prevent huge waiting times.

---

So it would look like this for Group F.

What we could also do, is to make P1/2 reversed from what it was in the original group (in this case, {~BiA85~} would get P1 in both games and lugia77781 would get both P2)

I don't see a problem with this.

Perhaps we could just take this idea of lowest turn count and apply it to the games already played to determine the winners?

That would mean you're the one getting victimized...

Are you sure of that? I know my loss with lugia was short, but weren't my other wins quick?

If such is the case then ya, I guess I wouldn't endorse that. Also, how long are we willing to wait for Lugia to chime in?

Looking at OSN:
lugia77781 v Spidêr: lugia wins in 8 turns;
Spidêr v {~BiA78~}: Spidêr wins in 19 turns;
lugia77781 v {~BiA78~}: {~BiA78~} wins in 10 turns.

Turns in lost game - turns in won game:

{~BiA78~}: 9
lugia77781: 2
Spidêr: -11

Counting other wins is gonna be trouble, so I won't do that.

But, back on topic. I still lobby for the tiebreak w/ turn count idea. It doesn't seem like there is any other reasonably sane idea (base health is far worse).