Best allround players

[Necrocat219]

Looks interesting and its a really good idea but as mentioned I think that you can definitely score better, you've weighted 1vs1 games as being directly being 5 times better than someone with only one 2vs2 team - not many people have the time to have 5 different partners ^^''. Also not many people have ranked in 2vs2 random so far (although I suspect that will change in the next few weeks) Here are a few propositions to improve it:

-give points equal to the place, 1 point for 1st, 2 for 2nd, etc. The lowest points gets highest rank and so on. This just follows what we already have and will make it easier to rank too - you might even be able to just simply export the top 100's to excel and data sort to make it easier (maybe)
-do an avarage of 1vs1, 2vs2 and 2vs2 random treating them equally - all people will value each have preferences so that would just suit to them better.
-Choose only the best 2vs2 team ranking OR an avarage of all their teams. I would choose the first as it wouldn't affect the top 2vs2 players from choosing to play with players who might be slightly worse.
-Only include players that have taken part in all 3 gamemodes (after a few weeks). This would probably be the only rule that I personally think is debatable but the top list for 2vs3 random should encourage players to take part - in a month or so more players would rise into it as they are encouraged to play.

Also I know everything I suggested would take more effort sorry about that - I can make a sample table later?