| Poll: Which maps (if any) should be retired? This poll is closed. |
|||
| Sharkfood Island |    |
68 | 11.91% |
| Long Nine | |
29 | 5.08% |
| Glitch | |
22 | 3.85% |
| Foundry | |
74 | 12.96% |
| Sweetie Plains | |
35 | 6.13% |
| Peekaboo | |
84 | 14.71% |
| Reaper | |
36 | 6.30% |
| Thorn Gulley | |
33 | 5.78% |
| Don't remove any maps! | |
190 | 33.27% |
| Total | 571 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Which Maps to Retire?
|
02-05-2013, 08:18 AM
Post: #32
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which Maps to Retire?
(02-05-2013 08:06 AM)TheGoldenGriffin Wrote: Lets add aggressive maps that have more spawn and wit spaces, units are 1 wit cheaper except for specials, and base hp of 8. Maybe even strategic maps with no wit spaces and no specials allowed. I feel like these are different game modes. I want different game modes implemented because i feel like they would be so much fun even though i understand they could be hard to make. Search and Destroy - no spawning new units, win by killing all of your opponents units or base Capture the Flag - instead of bases, both players have a flag. Win by taking your opponents flag back to your flag Back to the Basics (GoldenGriffin's idea) - no wit spaces or specials, win by normal conditions Hardpoint - capture a neutral area in the middle and hold it for points, get x amount of points to win College Basketball Tournament for Outwitters! They call me the weed cutter, the cutie killer, the machine masher, the pirate pulverizer. Outwitters Name: Coolio - da best |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)
5 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content