Poll: Which maps (if any) should be retired? This poll is closed. |
|||
Sharkfood Island | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
68 | 11.91% |
Long Nine | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 5.08% |
Glitch | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 3.85% |
Foundry | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
74 | 12.96% |
Sweetie Plains | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 6.13% |
Peekaboo | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
84 | 14.71% |
Reaper | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 6.30% |
Thorn Gulley | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 5.78% |
Don't remove any maps! | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
190 | 33.27% |
Total | 571 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Which Maps to Retire?
02-05-2013, 08:01 AM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which Maps to Retire?
(02-05-2013 07:41 AM)CombatEX Wrote: Because we aren't removing them, just from league. 50 league maps would be terrible. As I said above*, I'd rather see matchups and general strategy evolve to a high level on ~8 maps in league than 50 maps where no one really knows what they are doing until a year later. But then by that time since we just keep adding maps there are 100 maps! I see that side of the argument. But the other side is more play variety. I'm sure I'm not the only one who was most excited for the two new maps to be in league cirulation with the veggienaut update. I guess 50 is too much, you're right. But I also think we could have more than 8. I'd love 16! But you're definitely right about not feeling like you know what you're doing on a new map. I may be ST, but I only started to feel like I "understood" this game relatively recently. ![]() It'll be GG when you're up against GG of GG. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
6 Guest(s)
6 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content