The One Man Left clan tournament! - Take 2 incoming on June 25th

[Coolio]

(12-12-2012 11:04 PM)aaronINdayton Wrote:  

(12-12-2012 09:38 AM)Coolio Wrote:  Idea: say team 1 defeats team 2 with 2 players on team 1 surviving. Those 2 surviving players would be in the 2v2 match against any 2 players that team 2 chooses from their squad.

If team 1 only has 1 surviving player, then that player will be in the 2v2 match against 2 players from team 2 that team 2 chooses. The player to be teammates with the player from team 1 (the survivor) is chosen by team 2.

If team 1 has 3 or more survivors, team 1 gets to choose the two players they want in the 2v2 match against the 2 players team 2 chooses for their 2v2 team.

This may give a little advantage to the team that loses the 1v1 matchups and keep the whole tournament more equal.

What's the point of the 2v2 game in this case? If one team has already lost... then they lost! Would the 2v2 game decide the real winner? Then wouldn't it make sense to lose the 1v1 games so you can pick any two 2v2 players you want?

I was just throwing out a suggestion. You could possibly have the team winning the 1v1 get a point and the team winnin the 2v2 get a point and if there's a tie than have a third all or nothing game. I know people will say that the 1v1 is harder because you have to win 5 games but I was just suggesting.

Possibly, you could get a point each team you defeat a player. So if team 1 wins with 2 players left they get 5 points because they killed 5 players. But team 2 would get 3 points because they killed 3 of team 1s players. Then the 2v2 could be worth 2 points because you're killing 2 players. This would connect the 1v1 and 2v2 more like Gfich wanted.