Poll: What do you think about this proposed change: Gaining wits for kills?
'Wits for kills' would worsen the game
'Wits for kills' would improve the game
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters
10-26-2012, 07:01 PM (This post was last modified: 10-26-2012 07:02 PM by =) Random Task (=.)
Post: #72
RE: Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters
(10-26-2012 01:23 PM)CombatEX Wrote:  This is a similar to the point above, the game doesn't seem to need fixing. At least, not with such a major change to the fundamental gameplay. Maybe things like some minor unit balancing *cough* non-predeployed Heavy *cough*, but not a major overhaul like this.

I imagine the wit for kill rule may increase the heavy units tactical value as it is more likely to achieve a kill if within reach to attack. Also it is a unit which is more expensive to be killed (in wits terms) than all other units.

I'd be interested to play wit for kill as an optional/alternative game style while retaining the option to play classical games as well.

[Image: sig.png][Image: 2u7x1fb.jpg]
awesome signature design by .Memories.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters - =) Random Task (= - 10-26-2012 07:01 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
27 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content