Poll: What do you think about this proposed change: Gaining wits for kills?
'Wits for kills' would worsen the game
'Wits for kills' would improve the game
[Show Results]
 
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters
10-25-2012, 07:03 PM (This post was last modified: 10-25-2012 07:04 PM by =) Random Task (=.)
Post: #19
RE: Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters
I am also not taking part in the poll since I haven't played yet under the new rule. However I am a bit worried about the change.
I think such a change should be implemented as an option only, so that players can decide if they want a game with or without the "wit for kill" rule.

I once played an online game version of the strategy game "Risk" on http://www.takto.de. They also have several game variations as a selection and you were paired only to other players who selected to be paired according to the same selection.... it worked pretty well when I played it and the player community was smaller than the community outwitters is already attracting.
not to forget I agree we should also give room for the pro arguments.

[Image: sig.png][Image: 2u7x1fb.jpg]
awesome signature design by .Memories.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Alex & Adam - Getting +1 Wit for Kills: Why it's a really poor change to Outwitters - =) Random Task (= - 10-25-2012 07:03 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread:
27 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content