unfair pairrings
10-11-2012, 01:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-12-2012 02:27 PM by TheQwertiest.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
unfair pairrings
im being paired with people way above my league, in a lot of games, as player 2 :o
is this because of the lack of players? if theyre gonna pair me up with people way above me atleast give me the FTA. haha 7 games with necrocat 2 games with p1noyboypj and a few games with top gifted and lower masters. (im in clever but i think i will go back to fluffy by the time all these games are done.) edit: its now 5 games with p1noyboypj. im kinda hoping that he goes on a vacation and forgets to play outwitters. |
|||
10-11-2012, 03:35 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
Wow on my main (stuck in high clever) I hope to get matched against masters. Easier to tier jump if you win. However I do see you your point. Use those matches as a learning experience? (Trying to be optimistic) lol
|
|||
10-11-2012, 03:40 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
|
|||
10-11-2012, 03:40 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
That's probably because they started like 20 games at once. However, if there are no opponents in their range then they will get random players after a 2 day period with no matches.
|
|||
10-11-2012, 03:43 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
the thing is, i dont wanna tier jump. i know im not ready yet. haha
yeah, i will learn. the making you feel dumb, traumatic, long losing streak way. |
|||
10-11-2012, 03:46 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
It depends on how long you, or they have been in queue for. As you know, the system gets more lenient with pairings over a loner duration, so it might just have been them waiting for games and you choosing the wrong moment to start more
Or maybe your hidden ranking is just that good |
|||
10-11-2012, 03:49 PM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
(10-11-2012 03:46 PM)QuantumApocalypse Wrote: It depends on how long you, or they have been in queue for. As you know, the system gets more lenient with pairings over a loner duration, so it might just have been them waiting for games and you choosing the wrong moment to start more im hoping its the last statement. hahah its the only positive around all the losing im gonna get. |
|||
10-11-2012, 04:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-11-2012 04:06 PM by Necrocat219.)
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
I'm sorry querty, I had enough of getting matched up to players all week as player 2 so I let my P1 matches rip when I had a chance. And that was 2 days ago ^^' these are the only P1 games I've actually managed to get all week
Top 200 peak ranking: #18 I'm currently taking a competative break. Am up for friendlies and tournaments! (06-09-2014 02:14 PM)Bbobb555 Wrote: I looked it up, apparently a kendama is a yo-yo (!). How the heck do you have forums for yo-yos? |
|||
10-11-2012, 04:05 PM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
The system seems to jump immediately at 2 days to "search for anyone". It doesn't seem like there are intermediate grades. For example, I am a highly ranked Super Titan with powerful skills. It sometimes takes me several hours to find a game, and they are always from within top 40.
After 1 day, it doesn't lessen to, for example, top 200. It stays searching for top 40 players. Then after 2 days, it suddenly drops to "anyone at all". That's sort of strange I think, that there is no intermediate searching level. |
|||
10-11-2012, 09:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-11-2012 09:11 PM by Da Wizerd.)
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: unfair pairrings
(10-11-2012 04:05 PM)garcia1000 Wrote: The system seems to jump immediately at 2 days to "search for anyone". It doesn't seem like there are intermediate grades. This ^ I posted about this issue on a thread a while back (09-02-2012 12:32 AM)Dawizerd Wrote: Ok, so I decided to conduct a small experiment, and it may or may not have some correlation to this issue. I'll share the results. Da Wizerd - |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)
2 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content