1st GG Clan Tourney (WINNER: Anonymous Clan) [Concluded]
08-24-2013, 07:34 AM
Post: #131
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (CLAN WARS PUBLISHED) [Updated 08/21/13]
I think Thrutchys suggestion is a good one: playing in parallel once everything else is finished. The way things are going right now, I can't imagine even two at once, but once the other matches are settled down we could possibly handle doing the rest at once (in part because hopefully one or two will be done by then)
GC name: amoffett11 1v1 2v2 with .Memories. and 2v2 random Until you stalk and overrun you can't devour anyone |
|||
08-24-2013, 07:39 AM
Post: #132
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (CLAN WARS PUBLISHED) [Updated 08/21/13]
(08-24-2013 07:34 AM)amoffett Wrote: I think Thrutchys suggestion is a good one: playing in parallel once everything else is finished. The way things are going right now, I can't imagine even two at once, but once the other matches are settled down we could possibly handle doing the rest at once (in part because hopefully one or two will be done by then) Completely agree. You can ask a... (drawing by Chemoeum) |
|||
08-24-2013, 01:23 PM
Post: #133
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (CLAN WARS PUBLISHED) [Score Up to date]
I concur.
Top 200: #2 Winner, 2013 Winter World Cup, OWSA Tournament |
|||
08-24-2013, 01:29 PM
Post: #134
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (CLAN WARS PUBLISHED) [Score Up to date]
(08-24-2013 07:39 AM)Mag!cGuy Wrote:(08-24-2013 07:34 AM)amoffett Wrote: I think Thrutchys suggestion is a good one: playing in parallel once everything else is finished. The way things are going right now, I can't imagine even two at once, but once the other matches are settled down we could possibly handle doing the rest at once (in part because hopefully one or two will be done by then) Well yeah. It sounds reasonable. However, at some point, if there is any case where both clans would like to start one "meeting", we shouldn't stop them. It's up to them. Don't neglect your fellowship with God, family and study by playing video games. Be organized with your time GC name: jesusfuentesh 1v1; 2v2 |
|||
08-24-2013, 03:16 PM
Post: #135
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (CLAN WARS PUBLISHED) [Score Up to date]
I apologize to those still waiting for anonymous to send in their line ups. We are still in the process of setting who goes where. Many thanks to powee for helping btw.
|
|||
08-24-2013, 03:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-24-2013 03:20 PM by jesusfuentesh.)
Post: #136
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - [Score Up to date]
(08-24-2013 03:16 PM)Pastil* Wrote: I apologize to those still waiting for anonymous to send in their line ups. We are still in the process of setting who goes where. Many thanks to powee for helping btw. That's ok my friend. Don't neglect your fellowship with God, family and study by playing video games. Be organized with your time GC name: jesusfuentesh 1v1; 2v2 |
|||
08-24-2013, 05:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-24-2013 05:45 PM by Thrutchy.)
Post: #137
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (Diamond takes the lead) [Score Up to date]
I'd like to make another suggestion about the "meeting" games: a different player should captain in each game for a clan. And the leader should not be used for any of these so they can focus on the overall. This should enable different clan members to drive each meeting game in parallel when that phase is reached.
When we've reached this phase of this tournament, these captains can be named just like has been done for the others games. |
|||
08-24-2013, 07:35 PM
Post: #138
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (Diamond takes the lead) [Score Up to date]
that's is definitely good for me. thanks mate.
iPro Clan |
|||
08-24-2013, 09:42 PM
Post: #139
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (Diamond takes the lead) [Score Up to date]
(08-24-2013 05:43 PM)Thrutchy Wrote: I'd like to make another suggestion about the "meeting" games: a different player should captain in each game for a clan. And the leader should not be used for any of these so they can focus on the overall. This should enable different clan members to drive each meeting game in parallel when that phase is reached. What do you mean by "should not be used"? The leaders can't share thoughts about "the meeting" or the leaders shouldn't manage any meeting? What do you mean by "can be named"? I am sorry that I don't understand well Don't neglect your fellowship with God, family and study by playing video games. Be organized with your time GC name: jesusfuentesh 1v1; 2v2 |
|||
08-25-2013, 12:54 AM
Post: #140
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 1st Good Game Clan Tournament - (Diamond takes the lead) [Score Up to date]
(08-24-2013 09:42 PM)jesusfuentesh Wrote:(08-24-2013 05:43 PM)Thrutchy Wrote: I'd like to make another suggestion about the "meeting" games: a different player should captain in each game for a clan. And the leader should not be used for any of these so they can focus on the overall. This should enable different clan members to drive each meeting game in parallel when that phase is reached. Note that i am using the term "captain" just like america vs eurasia. I am just suggesting the captain is a different clan member for each meeting game (to better allow parallel play). The overall clan leader for the tournament shouldnt be a captain in any of these games because they have enough coordination to do (especially you as also the host of the entire tournament). |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)
2 Guest(s)
Return to TopReturn to Content