The Super Crazy Awkward Feedback Tournament [Round 6]

[Gf!sh]

Wait, we don't have a starting runner AGAIN.

[lawtai]

yea, no vision is hard haha

[Ser Purple Wolf]

Sorry. I removed the anti-scout round though, if that's any consolation.

[laYahooz]

Lost every game, still in the tourney XD

[Ser Purple Wolf]

(03-10-2013 03:16 AM)laYahooz Wrote:  Lost every game, still in the tourney XD

Yeah, this system isn't the best. It'll suffice though. Ill have to make up a better one next time

[Ser Purple Wolf]

I've got 3 games reported.

How's everyone else's game?

[harvarnold]

Still waiting on an invite from Gfish.

[Mag!cGuy]

(03-10-2013 02:13 PM)SerPurpleWolf Wrote:  

(03-10-2013 03:16 AM)laYahooz Wrote:  Lost every game, still in the tourney XD

Yeah, this system isn't the best. It'll suffice though. Ill have to make up a better one next time

A WAY better next time please. I've just lost against alvendor in 13 turns. I guess
I'll be eliminated then. If I waited before giving up, that would make 16 turns, and maybe I'd survive in this tourney

I don't get why the number of turns is the factor. I won my three previous battle, and will get eliminated now, when other players will continue to play even thought they didn't win once? Really, this is unfair. A system of life point for each participants, where you start with 3 points, lose 1 for a loss and win one for every 2 victories is 100 times better. Even if a tournamrnt is "for fun", you don't have to eliminate for random reason. All these rules (except, well, this one. No vision and only scrambler is really bad) are very awesome and I'd like to play them if I played well enough. Losing in more turns doesn't mean you're a better player.

[TheGreatErenan]

I like the rules because I am a faux Dadaist.

Also, I don't think you are supposed to say how many turns your game took, because then that informs others of how long to drag out their losses.

[Mag!cGuy]

Well, simply the fact you can drag out your loss to stay in the tourney make the rules bad.