+- One Man Left Studios Community Forums (http://www.onemanleft.com/forums)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Outwitters (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 (/showthread.php?tid=2509)
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - .Memories. - 08-31-2013 04:21 PM
(08-31-2013 01:59 PM)Doodat Wrote: League points mean absolutely nothing in terms of hidden rank. Those 40 league points are probably all wins.
He knows that. He's saying he wants the top players to be more active.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - [PETA] Doodat - 08-31-2013 04:26 PM
Ah, he added that part after I typed that up, I didn't see it.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - Sharugames - 08-31-2013 06:08 PM
Horrible 1v1 week
Lost 5 matches in a row to 5 different people.
Agree that hidden rank should include a rank dropping for inactivity so as to make sure people keep being challenged.
Nothing against random 2v2 vs teams but randoms should be teamed up with people of same league (i lost quite a few frustrating random matches being teamed with fluffy players)
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - terenceshiu2005 - 08-31-2013 07:17 PM
(08-31-2013 04:48 AM)Cor13:4 Wrote: Terence is already done with his veggie experiment? His veggie account is already off the list?
My target is top 20, being there by luck
(08-31-2013 06:42 AM)Doodat Wrote: Terence deranked. I played him twice during that time.
And I dropped like 60 ranks anyways... All dem 5 in a row Feedback on Thorn Gulley.
Did I? your alt (adorables)?
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - Mag!cGuy - 08-31-2013 08:02 PM
I do agree that people not playing for a long time should have their rank decreased. I'm not sure alvendor or poweewee are really better than the rest of the top 10 now, and because this rest of the top 10 is fighting, no one can reach top 3 even though the level is the same.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - Thrutchy - 08-31-2013 10:13 PM
If being on this list required league activity, it would probably solve much of the problem. i think any game activity is all that is required. I only have friendly games going on, so I would drop off and I'd be OK with that.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - [PETA] Doodat - 09-01-2013 02:49 AM
(08-31-2013 07:17 PM)terenceshiu2005 Wrote:(08-31-2013 04:48 AM)Cor13:4 Wrote: Terence is already done with his veggie experiment? His veggie account is already off the list?
My target is top 20, being there by luck
(08-31-2013 06:42 AM)Doodat Wrote: Terence deranked. I played him twice during that time.
And I dropped like 60 ranks anyways... All dem 5 in a row Feedback on Thorn Gulley.
Did I? your alt (adorables)?
My alt is AlliDooisRush.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - terenceshiu2005 - 09-01-2013 10:56 AM
ic. I was wonder who own this account. I'm sorry again for any trouble caused.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - poweewee - 09-01-2013 01:08 PM
(08-31-2013 08:02 PM)Mag!cGuy Wrote: I do agree that people not playing for a long time should have their rank decreased. I'm not sure alvendor or poweewee are really better than the rest of the top 10 now, and because this rest of the top 10 is fighting, no one can reach top 3 even though the level is the same.
I do play league games (not as much as before, but still around 3 games at a time) but the problem is that we are not often matched against any of the top 10 players.
On that note, I'd be happy to challenge all of the top 10 players, even as friendlies (or a tourney?).
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 8/30/2013 - amoffett11 - 09-01-2013 01:27 PM
(09-01-2013 01:08 PM)poweewee Wrote: On that note, I'd be happy to challenge all of the top 10 players, even as friendlies (or a tourney?).
Challenge accepted!
Oh wait...