+- One Man Left Studios Community Forums (http://www.onemanleft.com/forums)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Outwitters (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Thread: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 (/showthread.php?tid=2113)
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - GoHeat 3 - 04-13-2013 09:07 AM
^Go go!
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - harvarnold - 04-13-2013 09:11 AM
That's odd. I wonder why they decided to change it. Interestingly, on sweetie plains and thorn gulley you can't hit the back hex of the base. I wonder what makes makes sharkfood island different.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - [PETA] Cor13:4 - 04-13-2013 09:24 AM
Yeah, he probably thought he could and then doh! he couldn't. That lost the game for him right there.
I don't understand why not finishing your placement game makes it so you aren't in the top 200 (not that I mind being 54th this week!)
You can tell that they must have excluded the people, because the list only goes to 134. More than 134 people have definitely finished their placement games, so why not go to 200? Their list must have included the people who didn't finish their placement, but then they culled the list to exclude those people after it was generated, resulting in 134. Why do that?
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - GreatGonzales - 04-13-2013 09:38 AM
That's a good point. I looked up garethsan, lowest 1v1 top 200, and he is master league. Maybe that list is limited to master league and up only. But of course, there are gifted leaguers in the arranged 2v2 list, so I dunno. Maybe different rules for each.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - TheGoldenGriffin - 04-13-2013 10:11 AM
But a lot of master players are left out.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - awpertunity - 04-13-2013 10:35 AM
I think these rankings should be included and weighted higher than ever. This is clearly the ground truth. Alvendor has been slacking and it makes sense he is not in the top 135.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - amoffett11 - 04-13-2013 10:57 AM
(04-13-2013 09:38 AM)GreatGonzales Wrote: That's a good point. I looked up garethsan, lowest 1v1 top 200, and he is master league. Maybe that list is limited to master league and up only. But of course, there are gifted leaguers in the arranged 2v2 list, so I dunno. Maybe different rules for each.
Can't be, I'm master league, as are a bunch of others in my division that aren't here. There must be some rung that has to be passed to be "Top 200"
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - GreatGonzales - 04-13-2013 01:44 PM
(04-13-2013 10:35 AM)awpertunity Wrote: I think these rankings should be included and weighted higher than ever. This is clearly the ground truth. Alvendor has been slacking and it makes sense he is not in the top 135.
Haha, ok awpertunity.
(04-13-2013 10:57 AM)amoffett Wrote: Can't be, I'm master league, as are a bunch of others in my division that aren't here. There must be some rung that has to be passed to be "Top 200"
Hmm ok. But did you complete your placement match?
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - .Memories. - 04-13-2013 03:21 PM
(04-13-2013 01:44 PM)GreatGonzales Wrote: Hmm ok. But did you complete your placement match?
I can vouch for this. There are several people with around and greater than 50 points in our division that are not on this list, including myself and amoffett. There has to be a threshold.
RE: Weekly Top 200 - 4/12/2013 - awpertunity - 04-13-2013 04:04 PM
Haha I bet Alex and Adam love reading us come up with so many different theories for how their things ,that very well could have the simplest algorithms ever, are calculated.
[/drunk]